A word here about drills you see performed in professional presentations. They always run smoothly, don't they? And for good reason. The presenter is there to give you as much quality information as possible in a brief amount of time. If he has volunteers helping demonstrate the activity, they are either friends/colleagues/students familiar with the activity, or adult volunteers from the audience. Either way, their experience will be markedly different from your group of 8-year-olds trying anything for the first time. I'm just sayin'.
So here's how 105 works: Object of the game is to be the first team to win 105 points. Points are awarded as follows:
- Groundstroke winner: 5
- Volley winner: 10
- Overhead winner: 20
- Errors: 1 point for other team
Much easier? |
This game can be played by groups or teams in relay fashion, with the player losing the point rotating out and replaced by a different teammate.
A particularly fun aspect of this game: when it looks like one team is running away with the game, coach can change up the rules to help even things out. For example, winning team must hit all backhands, or all of their balls must be hit deeper than service line. You might think the winning team would resent this erosion of their lead, but they seem to appreciate the challenge. Heaven knows the losing team certainly appreciates it! Seriously, this is a great way to keep the game going for as long as you want it to go without one team getting hammered over and over again.
I like this game and I really want it to work. Next time I try it I might just shrink it down to 21 with points given being 1, 2, and 3 instead of 5, 10 and 20.
Update on the new 21 scoring scheme: last week I had a group of six 10Us play this game as doubles, 3 on each team, rotating one player out after each point. Quickly eliminated the -1 for errors as it was confusing - just gave the other team their point earned instead. The 1-2-3 scoring was indeed easier, but the one point differential was not motivating enough for them to risk a volley or an overhead - they wanted to stay with their safe shots. Next time I might try 1-5-10 (groundies, volleys, overheads). Even without the riskier shots the players really enjoyed this. We played it three times since the two teams split the first two rounds and were eager to determine a winner. The final round was very close, 21-20.
ReplyDeleteI am considering adding a stiffer penalty for netted balls as we are working on avoiding netted balls like the plague.